tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post1571200898863755214..comments2024-03-28T14:35:30.147-04:00Comments on Tank Archives: Lend Lease Impressions: M24 ChaffeePeterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-25969310299938291042014-06-01T21:08:24.331-04:002014-06-01T21:08:24.331-04:00Hey, hey, hey, you should talk about the M18 in it...Hey, hey, hey, you should talk about the M18 in its own post, and they were actually quite positive on the M18. It has an accurate gun, a good rate of fire and is still pretty fast (the loss of ~25km/h of highway speed presumably had to do with the Russians sticking the petrol they'd actually use in).arkhangelskhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15247250672432027166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-91324110784412156442014-05-21T19:08:00.228-04:002014-05-21T19:08:00.228-04:00http://tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2013/07/t-50s-reve...http://tankarchives.blogspot.ca/2013/07/t-50s-revenge-light-tank-with-heavy.htmlPeterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-33852957260877549042014-05-20T21:23:18.799-04:002014-05-20T21:23:18.799-04:00Lol everything I read from these reports sound so ...Lol everything I read from these reports sound so "Better than"<br />Fact is USSR had tons of crap. The way they paint the M18 was just funny seeing as it was much better than anything they had. <br />Also as said the T-70 was way less than the Chaffee....So what light did they consider to have "Good Armor" or was "Good Enough" in that year?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11151058224255705008noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-58558405556204133132014-05-13T09:56:32.491-04:002014-05-13T09:56:32.491-04:00Still, a much better tank than the T-70.Still, a much better tank than the T-70.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com