tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post2475275594467198715..comments2024-03-20T11:41:56.776-04:00Comments on Tank Archives: Schwere Feldhaubitze 18: Heavyweight SeniorPeterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comBlogger27125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-50249957830255967412022-12-14T07:18:51.744-05:002022-12-14T07:18:51.744-05:00Sorry I meant to say KRUPP..Sorry I meant to say KRUPP..Codyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15415499188701291429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-55256146815761596022019-07-14T01:28:40.448-04:002019-07-14T01:28:40.448-04:00I don't understand your logic: the most direct...I don't understand your logic: the most directly comparable Soviet howitzer is the ML-20, which shoots a slightly lighter round than sFH18 a longer distance (by 4 km) and is over 2 tons heavier.<br />sFH18 is an excellent howitzer in terms of firepower, range and only falls short in mobility.<br />ML-20 is a sFH18 with improved range but more weight and fires a lighter shell.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14832440432864130421noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-42745164924772750342019-07-14T01:21:26.370-04:002019-07-14T01:21:26.370-04:00ML-20 and A-19 are not superior to sFH18, just dif...ML-20 and A-19 are not superior to sFH18, just different.<br />They traded more range for more weight and less mobility - both strategic and "yikes" tactical. If you have a tough time setting up the sFH18, try it with ML-20. You will suffer the ultimate artillery crew man's nightmare when away from the front line.<br /><br />Further point, if we are only talking of technical superiority, then the sFH18 R.Gr. 19 rocket-assisted-round is definitely superior to ML-20.<br />The rocket round will only be used for counter-battery, not engaging infantry, and it's reduced explosive mass is more than sufficient for that purpose.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14832440432864130421noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-26988141879192654182018-07-06T12:12:26.333-04:002018-07-06T12:12:26.333-04:00Stupid Germany, made one howitzer at low barrel ca...Stupid Germany, made one howitzer at low barrel caliber, low chamber volume, low muzzle velocity, low fire rate, low elevation, all fault in one, they should be learned from Russian and kill thyself.AXis_ACEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09521962441054209532noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-89153516726478358162017-11-04T18:42:09.755-04:002017-11-04T18:42:09.755-04:00""Your comment will be published after a...""Your comment will be published after approval" -turns on on EVERY of my posts." Same as mine but they get published in some time.<br />Excuses over excuses, if that problem is running for so long time you would point it time ago.<br />But that is not the only point, you are one of the most biased information source I have met. You have pointed some information about the difference between Soviet and Nazi AP ammunition I have found it very interesting, I thank you for that. But you have ruined any good point you could have by your antiSoviet and proNazi fanatism. Let me explain.<br />If anyone is trying to find what did really happen, the normal way to proceed is to contrast and critique the wrong information and to put the information you have in context in order to give an overall view of the subject. This will show sometimes one side was performing better and other times the other side was the better one. But the ONLY information you give is in favor of one of the two dictatorship and you try to defend the information in favor of the other dictatorship is (by any means) wrong, clear sign you are a fanatic. To defend your loved side you say you base your arguments in some documents, but you NEVER give a link to them. I only see two options here, those documents only exist in your mind or you don't want anybody read them because the point you are defending will be compromised if that happens. Any of the both options make clear your arguments are incorrect.<br />Sumarizing I conclude you are a Nazi fanatic who uses incorrect information to try to iculcate doubts in the minds of the people. Basically a "critically massive troll" with a big amount of free time (a fact I envy quite a lot) focused in this subject and this webpage.Motzkorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18316989921665401048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-76912887584425598302017-10-30T18:45:30.205-04:002017-10-30T18:45:30.205-04:00I don't have per-user controls for the spam fi...I don't have per-user controls for the spam filter. That's simply not something that is implemented in the Blogger control panel. Give up your paranoid delusion.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-88412348289343171202017-10-30T08:22:02.265-04:002017-10-30T08:22:02.265-04:00That excuse isn't just hollow; it's *utter...That excuse isn't just hollow; it's *utterly absurd*.<br /><br />Tell me... <br /><br />Was my link on a jgp published which disprooved the PANTHER 88mm KWK43 commanders seat probelm? <br />Answer: No. Not after 3 sec. nor after 3 months<br /><br />Was my link on official Whermachtsberichte and german newspaper published which disprooved that the Wehrmacht claimed thousends of tanks in Peter´s latest "cheating statistics"? No. Not after 3 sec. nor after several days...<br /><br />so yes, he is taking care that information is filtered here. And no, I have no guarantee that the trouble I take with isolating primary sources is actually finding a way in these comments.<br /><br />"Your comment will be published after approval" -turns on on EVERY of my posts. Only sometimes my memos are published after a while -any guesses which comrade is making the selection?critical masshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02366274198749901618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-2796758559502632462017-10-28T09:42:39.648-04:002017-10-28T09:42:39.648-04:00You're talking like copypasting an Internets a...You're talking like copypasting an Internets address into a comment and hitting that blue "Publish" button down there cost more than three seconds of your time.<br /><br />That excuse isn't just hollow; it's *utterly absurd*.<br />Kellomieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04915110653443066212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-22209376010830494922017-10-27T09:18:01.050-04:002017-10-27T09:18:01.050-04:00Whatever you say buddy. You're right about one...Whatever you say buddy. You're right about one thing though: this is not a forum. This is a blog. Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-50059317789264099662017-10-27T08:31:55.542-04:002017-10-27T08:31:55.542-04:00""I can´t publish jpg in this format&quo...""I can´t publish jpg in this format" that's an excuse crit, you can publish any document (specially JPG) anywere in internet using real of fictitious accounts and link them here."<br />How am I supposed to be sure that my memo with the link are published here? There are multiple memo´s in the cheating statistics thread and this thread which Peter withdraw from publishing by using his "filter" excuse. Having a link in a memo wouldn´t change anything in the prospects to find it here. <br />This is not a forum, it´s a russian propaganda site. Unwelcomed informations are simply excluded.critical masshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02366274198749901618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-71853102459254823682017-10-24T15:14:34.514-04:002017-10-24T15:14:34.514-04:00"I can´t publish jpg in this format" tha..."I can´t publish jpg in this format" that's an excuse crit, you can publish any document (specially JPG) anywere in internet using real of fictitious accounts and link them here.<br />I agree Peter about your last excuse, I have never read anything in your posts which suggest they are being blocked.<br />I never read any positive information in your posts and your critics are not backed by anything. You are a textbook fanatic, your opinions are not valid.Motzkorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18316989921665401048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-77293648971092798742017-10-21T16:07:37.643-04:002017-10-21T16:07:37.643-04:00What's the point in taking the trouble to post...What's the point in taking the trouble to post, says the guy who can't stop posting. If you believe that there's some "special care list", go post your infallible evidence on your own blog. You seem to be in possession of hundreds, if not thousands, of these amazing documents, surely you would be very successful.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-17824179799284776742017-10-21T11:10:33.159-04:002017-10-21T11:10:33.159-04:00To be fair to the Kraut gun it also was around two...To be fair to the Kraut gun it also was around two tons lighter than its Soviet peer - or for that matter, the smaller-caliber 122 mm A-19 which pretty much shat on both in terms of range... though it's up for debate if that meant very much in practice given that large artillery pieces were an utter pain in the ass to move *anyway*.Kellomieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04915110653443066212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-31740663854268419532017-10-21T08:53:29.254-04:002017-10-21T08:53:29.254-04:00Peter, what´s the point to take the trouble postin...Peter, what´s the point to take the trouble posting on a propaganda site like this when I know in advance, that my memo is not published because You put me on a "special care" list?<br /><br />I know it´s convenient enough for You to deflect blame from Yourselfe by creating the impression that others cant provide any evidence, but it´s You´s action, which deletes the other readers the opportunity to see the data.<br /><br />Not that I expected anything else from You, Comrade.critical masshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02366274198749901618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-25227051853480075742017-10-20T16:48:53.202-04:002017-10-20T16:48:53.202-04:00It's not "my" filter. It's Googl...It's not "my" filter. It's Google's filter. I cannot configure it. And yeah, hammering away at the post button so fast that you can't even make sure your words are spelled right is probably making it more likely that they are being picked up as spam. <br /><br />As for evince, that was Motzkor's complaint all along: you don't actually post any. Strangely enough, your excuse before had nothing to do with spam filters. First it's you're busy, then you can't post jpgs, now there's a personal conspiracy at Google against you? It's all a little too convenient.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-38683271280994551862017-10-20T16:17:54.425-04:002017-10-20T16:17:54.425-04:00How curious that You´r filter does not approve my ...How curious that You´r filter does not approve my memos six (!) times in a row when I provide actual refuting evidence in Your cheating statistic alone while it does work fine here...critical masshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02366274198749901618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-74932958125057158552017-10-20T15:51:16.079-04:002017-10-20T15:51:16.079-04:00I enabled the junk filter for a good reason. I hav...I enabled the junk filter for a good reason. I have literally thousands of posts to wade through in between the comments made by actual humans. Forgive me for not taking the journey more often just to have more of your whining about the precious honour of the infallible SS-men.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-52357991772260140882017-10-20T15:43:31.707-04:002017-10-20T15:43:31.707-04:00"Your comment will be published after approva..."Your comment will be published after approval"<br /><br />...and another time my memo is not published, like the n-times before...critical masshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02366274198749901618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-74699696569859786322017-10-20T15:42:01.682-04:002017-10-20T15:42:01.682-04:00I don't delete posts. I do have to fish yours ...I don't delete posts. I do have to fish yours out of the junk filter quite often. I can't say I fault whatever their metric is.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-20755922216758205732017-10-20T15:37:23.859-04:002017-10-20T15:37:23.859-04:00I can´t publish jpg in this format. Plus, quite fr...I can´t publish jpg in this format. Plus, quite frequently, my memos here are removed without further notice.<br /><br />But if You are interested, 15cm Spgr42TS information, including range data, dispersion data, developmental reports, production schedules and engeneering drawing, can be found in the archive in Freiburg. BAMA RH8-1326 is just fine in regard to information about this projectile.critical masshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02366274198749901618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-28871481596830995092017-10-20T11:04:42.451-04:002017-10-20T11:04:42.451-04:00We covered this already, he's "far too bu...We covered this already, he's "far too busy" for such mundane things.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-76658826827087013352017-10-20T03:06:26.210-04:002017-10-20T03:06:26.210-04:00Inferiority or superiority not only depends in the...Inferiority or superiority not only depends in the ammunition used, there are a big amount of variables other than that. If the only positive factor of the sFH18 over the ML-20 is it can use a weaker special round to reach 5,23% more than the standard round of the ML-20 the german gun is inferior.<br />You should know it if you are not hugely biased (AKA fanatic)Motzkorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18316989921665401048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-13886149302409784902017-10-20T02:53:23.059-04:002017-10-20T02:53:23.059-04:00crit, you use to don't show your information. ...crit, you use to don't show your information. You say you own documentation and regarding to it some information is wrong. But refering to documents and don't showing them makes a logical mind think you are incorrect. This makes me think your sources are quite bad or they are directly nonexistent.<br />I'm specially interested in "cheating statistics" publications, why don't you publish your information in this regard if you can show "cheating statistics" are incorrect and (in your opinion) this is so easily provable? This behaviour only shows you are a common troll whose only special feature is you have focused in this webpageMotzkorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18316989921665401048noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-15045341520432993252017-10-19T08:26:29.303-04:002017-10-19T08:26:29.303-04:00Spgr42TS was not rocket assisted, nor was it ever ...Spgr42TS was not rocket assisted, nor was it ever tested or even conceived with rocket assistence. I have primary source documentation to this projectile.critical masshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02366274198749901618noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-33716890907559318882017-10-18T09:14:22.874-04:002017-10-18T09:14:22.874-04:00Well the *standard* HE round for the ML-20 had a r...Well the *standard* HE round for the ML-20 had a range of 17,200 meters with a 43 kg shell. <br /><br />The round you cite was rocket-assisted and although I can find no production data, I'm going to guess it was not a common round. Thus the ML-20 is left with a typical 4,000 meter range advantage. Dat34https://www.blogger.com/profile/05191197983174208313noreply@blogger.com