tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post7616300424557154237..comments2024-03-28T14:35:30.147-04:00Comments on Tank Archives: The Real Matilda I, ContinuedPeterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-90863895268728645132016-06-08T08:31:56.804-04:002016-06-08T08:31:56.804-04:00Now look. The long and short of it is that you'...Now look. The long and short of it is that you're not going to prove anything about this matter without actual, contemporary, British documents from back when the MkI was still vaguely relevant, ie. in (however modest) active service.<br /><br />At-best circumstantial evidence from however long after those junkers were retired isn't really going to cut it.Kellomieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04915110653443066212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-50928149726640824052016-06-07T20:12:12.490-04:002016-06-07T20:12:12.490-04:00Ah yes, a quote from "tanks-encyclopedia"...Ah yes, a quote from "tanks-encyclopedia", the amazingly reputable resource whose owner can't tell the difference between Latin and Cyrillic characters. Good job.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-63382510636178964672016-06-07T19:34:17.447-04:002016-06-07T19:34:17.447-04:00General Hugh Elles, Master-General of the Ordnance...General Hugh Elles, Master-General of the Ordnance, described his new “toy” as the “Matilda” <br />A11E1.<br /><br />Matilda A12 doesn't look anything like a 'toy'.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com