tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post8990266547725564644..comments2024-03-20T11:41:56.776-04:00Comments on Tank Archives: Red Army Tank Armament Norms, 1934Peterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-36989899908107788172014-12-16T02:14:38.570-05:002014-12-16T02:14:38.570-05:00Thank you very much for clearing this up.Thank you very much for clearing this up.Thor_Hammerschlaghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14230343757139315722noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-54066466810876107662014-12-15T10:13:07.026-05:002014-12-15T10:13:07.026-05:00SU-7 was an attempt to bring the 152 mm gun to a s...SU-7 was an attempt to bring the 152 mm gun to a self propelled chassis, but it had no 45 mm gun, and wasn't exactly a tank. Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-44541511680356573372014-12-15T03:17:06.464-05:002014-12-15T03:17:06.464-05:00Do You really think that the requirements of this ...Do You really think that the requirements of this tank were set so long before it was actually built? Wasnt there another tank planned earlier with similiar characteristics?Thor_Hammerschlaghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14230343757139315722noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-26132484455041468762014-12-14T16:27:42.142-05:002014-12-14T16:27:42.142-05:00T-100-Z? It took a while before a 152 mm gun could...T-100-Z? It took a while before a 152 mm gun could be mounted on a mobile chassis.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-72310282882580402702014-12-14T14:45:54.320-05:002014-12-14T14:45:54.320-05:00Yes variant one sounds like a t-35, but i have no ...Yes variant one sounds like a t-35, but i have no Idea what variant 2 could be. Thor_Hammerschlaghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14230343757139315722noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-27468777694594793012014-12-14T12:32:27.980-05:002014-12-14T12:32:27.980-05:00Great site! Well done.Great site! Well done.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-2460612537286978502014-12-13T16:15:38.275-05:002014-12-13T16:15:38.275-05:00Yup, those tanks came from this classification sys...Yup, those tanks came from this classification system. #3 would be a BT, yes, but there was no 76 mm version until very late in its service, obviously.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-64570173107503910622014-12-13T16:04:31.063-05:002014-12-13T16:04:31.063-05:00A special purpose high power tank would be include...A special purpose high power tank would be included in units subordinate directly to Stavka and used for important missions such as breakthroughs or assaults on fortified regions.Peterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-67627076309425848472014-12-13T09:37:13.107-05:002014-12-13T09:37:13.107-05:00#1 sounds like the T-27 or amphibious tank T-37/38...#1 sounds like the T-27 or amphibious tank T-37/38<br />#2 ("all-arms"→"infantry" tank) sounds like the T-26<br />#3 - is this a BT?<br />#4 - is this a T-28?<br />#5 - variant 1 sounds like a T-35arkhangelskhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15247250672432027166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-65100043036942957992014-12-13T04:14:34.931-05:002014-12-13T04:14:34.931-05:00Do You habe an idea what the "Special purpose...Do You habe an idea what the "Special purpose high power tank(s)" are or should be?Thor_Hammerschlaghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14230343757139315722noreply@blogger.com