tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post1982397100156006663..comments2024-03-28T14:35:30.147-04:00Comments on Tank Archives: Infantry Sweet SpotPeterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09622237223229485503noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-78270830512504100802017-11-06T09:36:43.513-05:002017-11-06T09:36:43.513-05:00Excellent information about the origins of this ta...Excellent information about the origins of this tank. Dat34https://www.blogger.com/profile/05191197983174208313noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-68242478293695354492017-11-03T21:37:41.453-04:002017-11-03T21:37:41.453-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.Kellomieshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04915110653443066212noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5030145265861917845.post-62062047302326336352017-11-03T20:36:31.704-04:002017-11-03T20:36:31.704-04:00"The Valentine IV was not built in fewer numb..."The Valentine IV was not built in fewer numbers than its predecessor."<br /><br />The 'not' seems to be incorrect based on the next sentence. Was this in the original article?Nik Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09153114063340447896noreply@blogger.com