Saturday 14 October 2017

Schwere Feldhaubitze 18: Heavyweight Senior

The German 150 mm heavy s.F.H. 18 heavy howitzer left a mark on the history of artillery. Developed in secret, given a made up name, combining excessive weight with excellent ballistics and reliability, this gun was one of the main pillars of German artillery in WWII, and continues to fight to this day in the Syrian Civil War. How did its history begin?

According to the Treaty of Versailles, Germany could not have more than seven infantry and three cavalry divisions after March 31st, 1920. The total size of its military could not exceed 100,000 men, including officers and civilians. The total number of officers, including staff, could not exceed 4000 men. The General Staff was disbanded, and could not be restored in any form. Conscription was outlawed, and the army could only be staffed with volunteers.

A German parade in Warsaw, fall of 1939. A s.F.H. 18 on a horsedrawn carriage is seen. The carriage carrying the barrel is seen in the foreground, the carriage in the background is carrying the mount. The wheels are completely metallic.

Artillery was greatly limited. Each infantry division would have one artillery regiment of three squadrons of 12 guns each, two of which would have cannons, and only one would have howitzers. The caliber of the guns was limited, in addition to their number: the limit was 105 mm light howitzers. 

The Germans were prohibited from developing any new types of armament, but work was secretly restarted outside of Germany. Heavy artillery was also forbidden, with one exception: the fortifications at Königsberg. It was permitted for a small number of heavy guns to be kept there, namely 150 mm model 1913 field howitzers (15 cm s.F.H. 13), one of the most common type of heavy weapons in the German Imperial Army.

Officially, 12 s.F.H. 13 howitzers were kept, with 400 rounds of ammunition each, but the Germans secretly kept more, including 210 mm mortars. This allowed for preparation of artillerymen and creation of a backbone of the future Wehrmacht heavy artillery force.

150 mm s.F.H. 13 and its crew.

An oversight commission was left in Germany to ensure that the treaty was followed, consisting of 337 officers and 654 soldiers. The commission prohibited the development of new weapons, and even closed Krupp's R&D branch, a leader in its field. The Germans restarted the work in, literally, the next town over. The commission left Germany on February 28th, 1927, after which there was no reason to hide.

Old howitzer, new tricks

According to the secret plan for reviving the German army, the amount of artillery would triple. Each regiment would grow into three, and new guns had to be developed, which met the requirements of the time. The old s.F.H. 13 was no longer suitable, and Krupp and Rheinmetall joined forces to develop a new heavy field howitzer, indexed s.F.H. 18 (schwere Feldhaubitze, heavy field howitzer) to maintain secrecy several months before the commission left. This kind of index would mislead any observer into thinking that the gun dated back to WWI, and was not a new development.

A design group that also worked on new artillery systems for the future Wehrmacht was given the task. Work took three years. By existing classifications, the s.F.H. 18 was a gun-howitzer. The barrel was designed by Krupp, and the mount by Rheinmetall. With a barrel length of 29.5 calibers, the muzzle velocity increased by almost 1.5 times, from 365 m/s to 520 m/s. The range increased from 8500 m to 13,300 m.

The s.F.H. 18 in combat position. Top: maximum gun elevation. Bottom: 0 degrees elevation.

The new mount, unlike old systems, had split trails and three resting points, approaching cruciform mounts in its characteristics. The mass of the s.F.H. 18 grew by almost 2.5 compared to the s.F.H. 13: from 2135 kg to 5512 kg, but the firing arc also grew, from 5 degrees to 60 degrees. The s.F.H. 18 mount could also be used for the 105 mm K18 gun (10 cm schwere Kanone 18). 

The weight of 5.5 tons meant that the barrel and mount had to be transported separately. The heavy weight forced the designers to omit the gun shield. The gun was meant to fire from rear positions, and the need to fire directly would only arise in an emergency. In these cases, it was also permitted to fire with the trails joined, but the vertical and horizontal aiming angles were limited.

The gun crew consisted of 12 men. The gun could be towed by horses or artillery tractors. Sets of six horses were used to tow the gun. The horse transport was given a priority, since the army lacked suitable mechanized transport.

s.F.H. 18 prepared for transport by horse. Top: mount carriage. Bottom: barrel carriage. The wheels are fully metal, with iron rims.

The gun was disassembled for transport by horse, the weight of each carriage totalling up to 4 tons. The top speed when towed in this form was 8 kph. The s.F.H. 18 could also be towed by tractors at a top speed of up to 60 kph on a paved highway.

With the appearance of the Sd.Kfz. 7 halftrack in 1938, the gun could be towed without disassembly. The barrel was pulled back to travel position. The top towing speed was 40 kph. If the gun was transported separately, it took 5-7 minutes to bring it back to combat position, a complex process that required eight men. When transported in one piece, it only took 3-4 minutes.

1300 mm fully metallic wheels were used when the gun was towed by horse. When it was towed with a tractor, 1230 mm wheels with solid rubber rims were used.

s.F.H. 18 howitzer with a barrel pulled back into travel position. The gun is towed by a Sd.Kfz. 7 halftrack. The wheels have rubber rims.

The s.F.H. 18 entered mass production at Dusseldorf, at the Rheinmetall-Borsig factory in late 1933. Production continued until 1945. The barrels were supplied by Krupp, and later other companies: Speerwerke, MAN, Dorris-Fullner, and (after occupation of Czechoslovakia) Skoda.

Starting with January 1st, 1934, when a new type of artillery regiment was formed. A fourth squadron, reserved for heavy artillery, was added. The long period of secret development, trials, and improvements did not go to waste: the army received an effective gun almost immediately, nearly free from "growing pains".

Modernization, successful and otherwise

The heavy weight of the gun forced the army to demand a modernization of the gun. From 1935 to 1939, a lightened variant of the howitzer was developed by Krupp and Rheinmetall, equipped with a lighter 23 caliber barrel. This variant received the title 15 cm schwere Feldhaubitze 36 (s.F.H. 36).

Moving the howitzer from travel to combat mode: removing the tail of the mount from the limber.

The barrel of the s.F.H. 36 was 99 cm shorter than of the s.F.H. 18, but the range also dropped by 825 meters, to 12,500 m. A muzzle brake was used to reduce the recoil length. Aluminium was introduced into the design of the mount. The mass in travel position was reduced by 2.23 tons, to 59.6% of the weight of its predecessor. This meant that the gun could be towed by one tractor or a six-horse cart. Production of the s.F.H. 36 began in 1939, but, due to a shortage of aluminium, it ceased in 1941. Very few guns of this type were produced.

Krupp and Rheinmetall received another order in 1938, for a gun with superior characteristics to the s.F.H. 18 and s.F.H. 36. This gun would have a barrel that was three calibers (45 cm) longer than on the s.F.H. 18, but also it would have a muzzle brake. The mass was 100 kg higher in combat position. The gun could fire at at elevation of up to 70 degrees, and the maximum range was 15,600 m. Further improvements included a pneumatic recoil brake, variable recoil length, and increased chamber volume: significant improvements to the s.F.H. 18 without radical modifications. The gun was ready by 1942, but war introduced its corrections: the need to change production, issues with raw materials, and the need to increase production volumes meant that this design was dead on arrival.

s.F.H. 36 howitzer from Die Wehrtechnische Studiensammlung im BAAINBw.

During preparations for production of the s.F.H. 40, Krupp produced a number of barrels for the gun. In order to put them to use, they were installed on the s.F.H. 18. This hybrid was called s.F.H. 18/40. The new barrel with an effective muzzle brake allowed the gun to fire up to a range of 15,100 m. The total mass was more or less the same as the s.F.H. 18. 46 of these guns were made in total.

There was another modification of the s.F.H. 18, called s.F.H. 42 or s.F.H. 18/43 in various sources. Some sources claim that the s.F.H. 42 is a renamed s.F.H. 18/40, others consider it a separate variant. This gun was built in very small numbers, and was equipped with a sliding semiautomatic breech, self-obturation, and a chamber that did not require a steel casing. The propellant was loaded into the weapon directly.

In 1942-43, further work by Krupp, Rheinmetall, and Skoda involved using three-trail or cruciform mounts. These mounts allowed for 360 degree fire at elevations of up to 70 degrees, and allowed a range of up to 18 km, while weighing less than the existing mount in both travel and combat positions. However, none of these creations moved past wooden models.
Hummel self propelled gun. The muzzle brake of the s.F.H. 18 is clearly visible.

The last noticeable modernization of the s.F.H. 18 was the attempt to install a muzzle brake in 1942, which reduced the load on the mount while firing, but it is not known whether or not this modification was widespread. Chamber liners were also introduced. Now, one could fire without worrying about wear from using the maximum charge. The barrel did not have to be entirely replaced, and the liners could be swapped even in battlefield conditions. The modernized gun was indexed s.F.H. 18M. The Panzerfeldhaubitze 18M auf Geschützwagen III/IV (Sf) Hummel, Sd.Kfz. 165, or Hummel, famously used this weapon.

In the hands of victors

After the war, Skoda modernized the s.F.H. 18 to match the needs of the Czechoslovak army, and modified the gun to work with Soviet ammunition. The gun was renamed 152 mm houfnice vz. 18/47. A new barrel with a muzzle brake was installed on the s.F.H. 18 mount. This modification served until the late 1980s, and a number of these howitzers were used for installation into the vz. 77 DANA (Samohybná Kanónová Houfnice vzor 77) self propelled howitzer.

Czechoslovak 152 mm houfnice vz. 18/47, Lešany military museum.

During WWII, the Red Army captured several s.F.H. 18, and the GAU performed trials. The results of the trials highlighted the following elements as deserving of attention:
  • The method of attaching recoil mechanism shields to the breech.
  • The method of attaching a hydraulic recoil mechanism inside a pneumatic one.
  • The lower mount design.
  • The suspension design.
  • The elevation mechanism flywheel, located on one of the trails.
However, the overall conclusions were negative:

"The gun is insufficiently simple, due to complex mechanisms, difficulty in finishing some parts, and many riveted connections. This makes it unsuitable for mass production. However, it is incorrect to call it complex from a production standpoint."

Shells and casings of the s.F.H. 18.

Tactical-technical characteristics of the s.F.H. 18 howitzer:

GAU data
German data
149 mm
149 mm
Barrel length
30 calibers
30 calibers
Maximum range
13,325 m
13,325 m
Minimum range
4000 m
Muzzle velocity
210-520 m/s
520 m/s
Vertical firing arc
Horizontal firing arc
Number of variable charges
Mass in combat position, without trails
5180 kg
5512 kg
Mass of the mount carriage
4000 kg
Mass of the barrel carriage
4095 kg
Rate of fire


  1. Inferior to the Soviet 152mm ML-20 in range.

    1. Depends on the ammunition used. sFH18 firing 15cm Gr.42TS had a range of 18100m. This projectile had a lower HE filler than the regular one.

    2. Inferiority or superiority not only depends in the ammunition used, there are a big amount of variables other than that. If the only positive factor of the sFH18 over the ML-20 is it can use a weaker special round to reach 5,23% more than the standard round of the ML-20 the german gun is inferior.
      You should know it if you are not hugely biased (AKA fanatic)

    3. To be fair to the Kraut gun it also was around two tons lighter than its Soviet peer - or for that matter, the smaller-caliber 122 mm A-19 which pretty much shat on both in terms of range... though it's up for debate if that meant very much in practice given that large artillery pieces were an utter pain in the ass to move *anyway*.

    4. ML-20 and A-19 are not superior to sFH18, just different.
      They traded more range for more weight and less mobility - both strategic and "yikes" tactical. If you have a tough time setting up the sFH18, try it with ML-20. You will suffer the ultimate artillery crew man's nightmare when away from the front line.

      Further point, if we are only talking of technical superiority, then the sFH18 R.Gr. 19 rocket-assisted-round is definitely superior to ML-20.
      The rocket round will only be used for counter-battery, not engaging infantry, and it's reduced explosive mass is more than sufficient for that purpose.

  2. Well the *standard* HE round for the ML-20 had a range of 17,200 meters with a 43 kg shell.

    The round you cite was rocket-assisted and although I can find no production data, I'm going to guess it was not a common round. Thus the ML-20 is left with a typical 4,000 meter range advantage.

    1. Spgr42TS was not rocket assisted, nor was it ever tested or even conceived with rocket assistence. I have primary source documentation to this projectile.

    2. crit, you use to don't show your information. You say you own documentation and regarding to it some information is wrong. But refering to documents and don't showing them makes a logical mind think you are incorrect. This makes me think your sources are quite bad or they are directly nonexistent.
      I'm specially interested in "cheating statistics" publications, why don't you publish your information in this regard if you can show "cheating statistics" are incorrect and (in your opinion) this is so easily provable? This behaviour only shows you are a common troll whose only special feature is you have focused in this webpage

    3. We covered this already, he's "far too busy" for such mundane things.

    4. I can´t publish jpg in this format. Plus, quite frequently, my memos here are removed without further notice.

      But if You are interested, 15cm Spgr42TS information, including range data, dispersion data, developmental reports, production schedules and engeneering drawing, can be found in the archive in Freiburg. BAMA RH8-1326 is just fine in regard to information about this projectile.

    5. I don't delete posts. I do have to fish yours out of the junk filter quite often. I can't say I fault whatever their metric is.

  3. "Your comment will be published after approval"

    ...and another time my memo is not published, like the n-times before...

    1. I enabled the junk filter for a good reason. I have literally thousands of posts to wade through in between the comments made by actual humans. Forgive me for not taking the journey more often just to have more of your whining about the precious honour of the infallible SS-men.

  4. How curious that You´r filter does not approve my memos six (!) times in a row when I provide actual refuting evidence in Your cheating statistic alone while it does work fine here...

    1. It's not "my" filter. It's Google's filter. I cannot configure it. And yeah, hammering away at the post button so fast that you can't even make sure your words are spelled right is probably making it more likely that they are being picked up as spam.

      As for evince, that was Motzkor's complaint all along: you don't actually post any. Strangely enough, your excuse before had nothing to do with spam filters. First it's you're busy, then you can't post jpgs, now there's a personal conspiracy at Google against you? It's all a little too convenient.

    2. Peter, what´s the point to take the trouble posting on a propaganda site like this when I know in advance, that my memo is not published because You put me on a "special care" list?

      I know it´s convenient enough for You to deflect blame from Yourselfe by creating the impression that others cant provide any evidence, but it´s You´s action, which deletes the other readers the opportunity to see the data.

      Not that I expected anything else from You, Comrade.

    3. What's the point in taking the trouble to post, says the guy who can't stop posting. If you believe that there's some "special care list", go post your infallible evidence on your own blog. You seem to be in possession of hundreds, if not thousands, of these amazing documents, surely you would be very successful.

  5. "I can´t publish jpg in this format" that's an excuse crit, you can publish any document (specially JPG) anywere in internet using real of fictitious accounts and link them here.
    I agree Peter about your last excuse, I have never read anything in your posts which suggest they are being blocked.
    I never read any positive information in your posts and your critics are not backed by anything. You are a textbook fanatic, your opinions are not valid.

  6. ""I can´t publish jpg in this format" that's an excuse crit, you can publish any document (specially JPG) anywere in internet using real of fictitious accounts and link them here."
    How am I supposed to be sure that my memo with the link are published here? There are multiple memo´s in the cheating statistics thread and this thread which Peter withdraw from publishing by using his "filter" excuse. Having a link in a memo wouldn´t change anything in the prospects to find it here.
    This is not a forum, it´s a russian propaganda site. Unwelcomed informations are simply excluded.

    1. Whatever you say buddy. You're right about one thing though: this is not a forum. This is a blog.

    2. You're talking like copypasting an Internets address into a comment and hitting that blue "Publish" button down there cost more than three seconds of your time.

      That excuse isn't just hollow; it's *utterly absurd*.

    3. That excuse isn't just hollow; it's *utterly absurd*.

      Tell me...

      Was my link on a jgp published which disprooved the PANTHER 88mm KWK43 commanders seat probelm?
      Answer: No. Not after 3 sec. nor after 3 months

      Was my link on official Whermachtsberichte and german newspaper published which disprooved that the Wehrmacht claimed thousends of tanks in Peter´s latest "cheating statistics"? No. Not after 3 sec. nor after several days...

      so yes, he is taking care that information is filtered here. And no, I have no guarantee that the trouble I take with isolating primary sources is actually finding a way in these comments.

      "Your comment will be published after approval" -turns on on EVERY of my posts. Only sometimes my memos are published after a while -any guesses which comrade is making the selection?

    4. I don't have per-user controls for the spam filter. That's simply not something that is implemented in the Blogger control panel. Give up your paranoid delusion.

    5. ""Your comment will be published after approval" -turns on on EVERY of my posts." Same as mine but they get published in some time.
      Excuses over excuses, if that problem is running for so long time you would point it time ago.
      But that is not the only point, you are one of the most biased information source I have met. You have pointed some information about the difference between Soviet and Nazi AP ammunition I have found it very interesting, I thank you for that. But you have ruined any good point you could have by your antiSoviet and proNazi fanatism. Let me explain.
      If anyone is trying to find what did really happen, the normal way to proceed is to contrast and critique the wrong information and to put the information you have in context in order to give an overall view of the subject. This will show sometimes one side was performing better and other times the other side was the better one. But the ONLY information you give is in favor of one of the two dictatorship and you try to defend the information in favor of the other dictatorship is (by any means) wrong, clear sign you are a fanatic. To defend your loved side you say you base your arguments in some documents, but you NEVER give a link to them. I only see two options here, those documents only exist in your mind or you don't want anybody read them because the point you are defending will be compromised if that happens. Any of the both options make clear your arguments are incorrect.
      Sumarizing I conclude you are a Nazi fanatic who uses incorrect information to try to iculcate doubts in the minds of the people. Basically a "critically massive troll" with a big amount of free time (a fact I envy quite a lot) focused in this subject and this webpage.

  7. Stupid Germany, made one howitzer at low barrel caliber, low chamber volume, low muzzle velocity, low fire rate, low elevation, all fault in one, they should be learned from Russian and kill thyself.

    1. I don't understand your logic: the most directly comparable Soviet howitzer is the ML-20, which shoots a slightly lighter round than sFH18 a longer distance (by 4 km) and is over 2 tons heavier.
      sFH18 is an excellent howitzer in terms of firepower, range and only falls short in mobility.
      ML-20 is a sFH18 with improved range but more weight and fires a lighter shell.

    2. Sorry I meant to say KRUPP..