Tuesday 5 November 2019

Lessons Learned

"Secret
To Comrade Beria
January 27, 1944

Based on the recommendations given by the commander of the 3rd Ukrainian Front, Army General comrade Malinovskiy, we report that:
  1. Item 1 in comrade Malinovsky's letter proposed installation of spaced armour 30-50 mm thick on the SU-85 and SU-122 SPGs.
    We consider that it would be unacceptable to install 30-50 mm thick spaced armour on the SU-85 and SU-122 SPGs on the T-34 chassis due to excess weight and overloading of the front suspension, which would radically reduce the lifespan of the transmission and running gear.
    An experimental SPG with a 100 mm gun is being built which will have 75 mm of front armour. Trials will show how feasible this undertaking is.
  2. Item 2a proposes the installation of a telescopic or periscopic sight for the radio operator's hull machinegun on the T-34.
    The Kirov factory installed optical sights on machineguns in a batch of 50 T-34 tanks.
    After the GBTU comes to a conclusion on field tests of the sight a decision will be made regarding installing these sights in production T-34 tanks.
  3. The same item proposes the installation of a periscope in the radio operator's hull side.
    The issue of feasibility of installing a periscopic observation device in the radio operator's station will be reviewed at factory #183. Factory #183 has been instructed to work on this issue and come to a conclusion within 10 days.
  4. The same item proposes installing a large caliber machinegun in the T-34."

2 comments:

  1. Exactly what suspension improvements were made when they put the 85 mm in the front of the T-34 hull? And heavier guns.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think that strengthening the springs was the only change that was made.

      Delete